How To: ABT Test Module Template

ABT Test Module Template

Action Based Testing (ABT) is an efficient method of test development that provides a systematic approach to increase the success of automated testing. This template will provide you with an easy to follow format that will make it easy for you to get started creating tests for manual and automated testing that you can easily scale and update as the system under test changes.

ABT uses Test Modules to increase the efficiency of test development. Test modules provide a level of abstraction over test cases and make it possible to create a well-defined test case flow. The top-down planning approach helps to create test cases that are free of unnecessary details and redundant checks. Test cases themselves are authored using actions that make the tests readable and that can be automated without the need of programming skills.

Test Modules are best thought of as containers for organizing tests of user stories or software requirements. This way every test module will have a clear and well-differentiated scope from every other test module, which reduces redundant steps and checks, which makes tests less fragile and easier to maintain. Giving each Test Module a descriptive name makes it easy to identify what the test in the module cover.

There are four sections to a Test Module: Objectives, Initial, Test Case and Final7.3

The OBJECTIVES section lists every objective associated with the module’s test cases and defines the scope of the test module. Objectives allow readers to understand why test cases are designed the way they are, and give an auditor a quick insight into the correctness and completeness of a test.

The INITIAL section of a test module contains the action lines required for initialization of the test. For example, actions for launching the application under test would be written here, and would avoid repetitive steps in test cases when initialization is required multiple test cases in the module.

The TEST CASE section is where test cases are created. Each test case has a representative number, accompanied by tile and test objective line. The title and objective explain the test case purpose. Test Modules can have multiple test cases and each may have one or more test objectives associated with it.

The FINAL section is for any cleanup operation upon test completion, such as closing the application under test.

See the full details for constructing an ABT test module at https://www.testarchitect.com/support/action-based-testing/how-to-write-test-module

LogiGear Corporation

LogiGear Corporation provides global solutions for software testing, and offers public and corporate software-testing training programs worldwide through LogiGear University. LogiGear is a leader in the integration of test automation, offshore resources and US project management for fast and cost-effective results. Since 1994, LogiGear has worked with hundreds of companies from the Fortune 500 to early-stage startups, creating unique solutions to exactly meet their needs. With facilities in the US and Vietnam, LogiGear helps companies double their test coverage and improve software quality while reducing testing time and cutting costs.

For more information, contact Joe Hughes + 01 650.572.1400

Get TestArchitect Team Free


LogiGear Corporation
LogiGear Corporation provides global solutions for software testing, and offers public and corporate software testing training programs worldwide through LogiGear University. LogiGear is a leader in the integration of test automation, offshore resources and US project management for fast, cost-effective results. Since 1994, LogiGear has worked with Fortune 500 companies to early-stage start-ups in, creating unique solutions to meet their clients’ needs. With facilities in the US and Viet Nam, LogiGear helps companies double their test coverage and improve software quality while reducing testing time and cutting costs.

The Related Post

Two powerful test methods for fast-paced development organizations As development teams have been pushed faster and into tighter scrum sprints, testing has burst through old development paradigms. Developers are being pressed to do more unit testing. Automated smoke tests are essential parts of CI (continuous integration) and full, automated regression suites are being run across ...
Achieving success with automated testing can be difficult. With the combination of Action Based Testing and TestArchitect, success is possible. Avoiding something because it’s difficult will never get you anywhere in today’s day and age. Even though making automated testing successful in terms of both scalability and long-term maintainability is often regarded as a challenge, ...
To address the challenges and fears of implementing Automation in Agile projects, LogiGear CTO Hans Buwalda presents Action Based Testing as the answer.
Agile methods are becoming more and more popular and successful for developing IT systems. Typical properties of an Agile method, like Extreme Programming, involve continuous user involvement and emphasize on the testing role (‘Users’ may be the actual users of the system you are creating, customers, or business analysts who provide the requirements on behalf ...
Introduction Keyword Based Testing is gaining ground. More and more organizations see this model, in which tests are not scripted but written as a series of keywords with arguments, as a valuable alternative to record and playback, or scripting of tests. A good theoretical basis for keywords can be found in the well known Automation ...
TestArchitect for Visual Studio is a keyword authoring platform extension designed specifically to enhance coded UI Test Automation in Visual Studio 2012. Microsoft’s Visual Studio’s ALM solution helps organizations manage the entire lifespan of application development and reduce cycle times. With the introduction of coded UI as an integrated component of Visual Studio® in 2010, ...
The best part of Action-Basted Testing is that it is for thinking people. It is intelligent and creative. It is a much saner way to evolve a testing project. All testers and quality engineers hear about Action-based testing (ABT) or keyword-driven testing somewhere. There are automation tools focused on keywords and actions. Maybe people have ...
ABT and Keyword-driven testing – Similarities and Differences Both Keyword-driven testing and Action Based Testing (ABT) use a test authoring approach that separates much of the programming work of test automation from the actual test design. This allows tests to be developed earlier and aids in tests maintenance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe