Test in Production?

This post is part of the Pride & Paradev series

13691-NPAE1I

With continuous deployment, it is common to release new software into production multiple times a day. A regression test suite, no matter how well designed, may still take over 10 minutes to run, which can lead to bottlenecks in releasing changes to production.

So, do you even need to test before going live? Why not just test changes in production?

Test changes in production

The website for The Guardian, the UK’s third largest newspaper, deploys on average 11 times a day, of which all changes are tested in production.

Once the code is in production, QA can really start.” “Sometimes deployments go wrong. We expect that; and we accept it, because people (and machines) go wrong. But the key to dealing with these kind of mistakes is not to lock down the process or extend the breadth, depth and length of regression tests. The solution is to enable people to fix their mistakes quickly, learn, and get back to creating value as soon as possible.”

~ Andy Hume on Real-time QA [The Guardian Developer Blog]

The key to testing changes as soon as they hit production is to have real time, continuous real user experience monitoring. This includes metrics like page views and page load time, which directly correlate to advertising revenue, an incentive to keep these healthy.

More comprehensive automated acceptance tests can be written in a non-destructive style that means they can be run in production. This means that these can be run immediately following a fresh production deployment, and as feedback about the tests is received, any issues can be remedied immediately into production and tested again.

Test changes before production

There are not many businesses that are able to release software without any form of testing into production: whether there be legislative requirements requiring testing, or the risk of introducing errors is too high for its target market.

Whilst automated regression tests do take longer to run than unit or integration tests, there are ways to manage these to ensure the quickest path into production. These strategies include running tests in parallel, only running business critical tests, only running against the single most popular browser, or only running tests that are directly related to your changes.

You can set up a deployment pipeline that runs a selected subset of tests before deploying into production then running the remaining tests (in a test environment). Any of the issues found in subsequent tests are judged to see whether they warrant another immediate release or whether they can be included in the next set of changes being deployed into production.

Whilst you definitely should run tests before deploying to production, it doesn’t mean that this has to drastically hinder your ability to continuously deploy.

Alister

Alister is an Excellence Wrangler for WordPress.com at Automatic. He has extensive experience in automated software testing and establishing quality engineering cultures in lean cross-functional software development teams. He lives in Brisbane, Australia with his wife and three sons, and writes a popular software testing blog at watirmelon.com.

Alister Scott
Alister is an Excellence Wrangler for Wordpress.com at Automatic. He has extensive experience in automated software testing and establishing quality engineering cultures in lean cross-functional software development teams. He lives in Brisbane, Australia with his wife and three sons, and writes a popular software testing blog at http://watirmelon.com.

The Related Post

Over the years we’ve provided an extensive number of articles, videos, and infographics that provide a wealth of knowledge about Continuous Delivery.
Continuous Testing and Continuous Monitoring What is the goal of Continuous Integration? Is it to enable Continuous Delivery of the code developers’ produce out to users? Yes, eventually. But first and foremost it is to enable ongoing test and verification of the code. It is to validate that the code produced and integrated with that ...
From the culture shift, to differences in Agile, Dave Farley and Michael Hackett discuss the nitty gritty of Testing in DevOps. For this issue of LogiGear Magazine, our very own Michael Hackett sat down with one of the godfathers of Continuous Delivery, David Farley. In this exclusive interview, David discusses how test teams and automation ...
Disclaimer: This article was originally published in the LogiGear Magazine, but has been updated for the June 2020 issue. Leading an organization into Continuous Delivery is a daunting task that usually takes software development teams months if not years. This guide covers the main points that organizations need to consider to increase their chance of ...
It is a fundamental role for testing teams to align their test design, test automation, and test case development with DevOps–not only to verify that code changes work but that the changes do not break the product. A key differentiator of DevOps is testing maturity. An organization can automate their integration, testing, delivery, and monitor, ...
In this article, I share some of my experiences and observations on training teams, mainly in corporate settings. The operative word here is “team”, not “individual”. When training teams or groups in an organization, many of the considerations and benefits are different than those for the individual. We’ll examine those differences and I will share successful solutions.
DevOps for Test Teams By Michael Hackett Now that Dev Teams have had a little time to settle into the Agile, the new wave of process optimization has arrived. DevOps. DevOps has been described as Agile on Steroids. DevOps has also been described as Agile for Operations/IT. I like both of those descriptions as well ...
LogiGear Magazine June Issue 2020: Transform Your SDLC With Continuous Testing
As a software development company, what is your goal? What is the one thing you feel you need to do to ensure you have a job at the beginning of each wonderful work week? The answer is actually quite simple; You need to deliver a quality product. Like how I used the word simple? Although the answer I ...
LogiGear Magazine June Issue 2018: TESTING in DEVOPS
How Halliburton leveraged outsourcing to achieve their goals. Organizations are focusing on speed, both in Continuous Integration and rapid deployment as a competitive advantage. Many software development organizations can significantly shorten development cycles by implementing one or a combination of Agile practices, continuous integration & deployment methods, and feature branches. While these frameworks and techniques ...
LogiGear Magazine – December 2013 – Cloud Testing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe