Letter From The Editor – December 2019

This is a very special issue of LogiGear Magazine. When we were putting together the Editorial Calendar for this year, we decided that instead of a technology issue, we would focus on the human side of quality and test engineering. We want to focus on individual Test Engineers and their jobs. We talked to a variety of people who work in quality every day, in all sorts of fields. Some of these fields include government, consumer products, security, insurance, education, banking and finance, and more. We also got answers from around the world!

Testing is a multifaceted practice and process-this is one of the things that attracted me to it. It can be complicated, we design and engineer tests, not to forget “the exciting world of” product development.

It’s also quite misunderstood. Some people underestimate the creativity involved in designing tests, designing data, and even sometimes designing an environment and condition to execute those tests and apply that data. Some people also underestimate how repetitive testing is. Run a test. Change one thing. Run another test. Change one thing. Run another test.

The people coming into the field are typically those who do not understand it. It is also mistaken by people who are scheduling it, waiting for it to be done, and the people who manage it. I hope this issue gets people wondering about testing as a career, as well as a glimpse into what testing work is about. We also want to provide people who work with test teams as opposed to in test teams a view into what test teams do, in addition to what they like and do not like about their work. We tried to get as many different situations of test work as possible. Testing is very different from company to company. What passes for normal workday and common practices in one company might never happen in another company whose practices and execution may be completely unique. There are few rules in testing. There are suggestions and some guidelines, but in the end, there are no standard practices–it’s always content-driven.

In my work, I also see how varied the quality world is, from testing being an afterthought that barely happens so the product can meet a schedule, to quality running the entire development and deployment schedule on safety-critical products, and everything in between. I thought it would be a benefit to test teams and the software development world to hear this from the people who work in the software development industry, rather than a simple survey, or just me relaying other people’s experience. So, we decided to have an issue only about testers telling their story, ranging from what they like, what they don’t like, what is frustrating, and simply just what testers actually do day-to-day. 

We hope you enjoy this issue. We had fun talking to so many people working in the field to develop this content. Also–it’s not over! You can join in by now going to our website and reading the other Tester Profiles submitted, as well as post your own!

Michael Hackett
Michael is a co-founder of LogiGear Corporation, and has over two decades of experience in software engineering in banking, securities, healthcare and consumer electronics. Michael is a Certified Scrum Master and has co-authored two books on software testing. Testing Applications on the Web: Test Planning for Mobile and Internet-Based Systems (Wiley, 2nd ed. 2003), and Global Software Test Automation (Happy About Publishing, 2006). He is a founding member of the Board of Advisors at the University of California Berkeley Extension and has taught for the Certificate in Software Quality Engineering and Management at the University of California Santa Cruz Extension. As a member of IEEE, his training courses have brought Silicon Valley testing expertise to over 16 countries. Michael holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University.

The Related Post

In our continuing effort to be the best source of information for keeping testers and test teams current, we have another issue to explore testing in Agile development. As Agile evolves, systemic problems arise and common rough situations become apparent. We want to provide solutions. For anyone who has worked on Agile projects, especially if ...
I led the Editor’s Note in our very first mobile issue with “Everything is mobile”, but it is now way beyond what we thought. Mobile has come to mean only the smart phone, mobility is the word that describes everything a smart phone enables you to do. Mobility is more than a device! Mobility is ...
“Why do we need to understand a bunch of test methods? I write test cases from user stories or requirements, automate what I can and execute the rest manually, and its fine.” If this is your situation: good for you. If you are time crunched, if your automated tests have lost relevance, are hard to ...
Automation is a mantra in testing. Anyone associated with software development wants more test automation, but it’s often misunderstood. People who do test automation know how difficult it can be. But some people do not understand that automation is code, and that it needs to have architecture and design just like production code. They do ...
Hi everyone and welcome to our fourth edition of LogiGear Magazine. This month we finish Michael Hackett’s piece on “Agile in Testing” with part five, Tools.
As part of my work, I spend a lot of time at client’s sites and talk to various software development organizations. I am beginning to see a problem arise regarding Test Automation. There is too much automation! Surprised? While there are still many teams struggling to make progress with Test Automation, many teams have been doing ...
Testing Embedded systems and testing the Internet of Things could each have their own issue of LogiGear magazine. But these days they are referred to presupposing knowledge of the other, so we thought it would be a good idea to tackle the two together in this issue to give a broad understanding of the landscape ...
There is a growing software development dynamic of teams without Testers. When I first went into Software Quality, I learned one thing right away: My role was user advocate. My main job was to find bugs. This is the Lean principle called Amplified Learning. We learn about behavior by testing. Even then, validation was not ...
Integrated teams Something we’ve learned in the Covid-19 pandemic is that we have to work together-whatever together means. Very few teams stayed co-located; even teams in the same town worked at home. We’re all working remote. Hopefully all the thinking, tools, work and effort we put into having offshore teams work together benefited us here. ...
A while ago, I helped start a Software Quality Certificate Program as a part of the Software Engineering Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz Extension in Silicon Valley. I was on the Board of Advisors. While putting the curriculum together, a few people suggested a Measurement and Metrics course. Since I was teaching ...
Because of the type of work I do (consulting projects at different companies), I’ve been lucky in my Software Development career to have worked on a bunch of software projects specific to hardware devices or integrating new hardware into software systems. Starting with the Palm Pilot, I worked on some operating systems (OS) projects, firmware, ...
We launched the first ever software testing conference in Vietnam, VISTACON. It was a resounding success, with well over 200 participants and 20+ speakers from around the globe; each speaking on a wide range of cutting-edge testing topics. In this month’s magazine, we have uploaded several video recordings of event presentations – giving our readers ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay in the loop with the lastest
software testing news

Subscribe